DATE: Fri, 10 Dec 1993 14:50:09 CDT From: Chris Pierce Subject: Answer to Richard's Harp-Mgr question....
Richard,
My Sys-Admin changed a few of the things lately; such as the list owner being Harp-Mgr and having that be an alias for me, which is the prefered method for that sort of thing.
Anyway, I forwarded your message to him and here is what he said:
******************************************************************************* Chris Pierce writes: > >Hunter, > >What's the deal with that? Is that the way it is supposed to be? >
Sounds like his is ignoring the Reply-To: and using the Sender:, which it's not supposed to do. *******************************************************************************
There you go, the answer to your question. Along with a very informative SUBJECT line. No wondering here what the message was about. =:)
On that note, I DO agree that it would be nice to have more informative subject lines. But remember, most people probably just REPLY to the messages they get, which on many systems AUTOmatically sets the subject line to RE: whatever it was before.
But it is a nice idea. I'll try to do better about that myself.
