DATE: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 09:25:36 CST From: Dick Anderson Subject: Reed Fatigue
I have long been interested in the forces acting on reeds and damage caused by the various legendary taboos such as: Not breaking in a reed, bending on 5 draw, bending too loudly. I even read one report of reeds "healing" themselves by aging under one guy's bed.
The first mechanical engineer I talked to mentioned the work hardening theory of reed destruction, but I discounted that theory on the same basis as others have mentioned that if the reed was getting stiffer, the note produced would go up. Instead, we notice reeds going "flat" or lower as they age and wear out.
Also, I think work hardening only happens when a metal is stressed beyond it's elastic limits causing a permanent deformation. An example of bending a coat hanger wire was given earlier, but I'm sure the writer was speaking of permanent deformation, not an elastic cyclical motion of the wire.
If springs work hardened under elastic cycling, then automobile coil springs which suffer small elastic deformations all their life should get stiffer and stiffer until finally they crack and break. This is also not seen in practice. Although I have seen leaf springs crack and break.
I have been reading about metal fatigue and am in quite over my head, but from the texts I have been able to glean these few gems:
1. Cyclic stresses below the point of permanent deformation do cause shifting of the atomic structure and eventually lead to crack formation and growth which eventually leads to complete failure. (Reed broken off)
2. The larger the deformation and the higher the number of cycles, the sooner that a crack will develop and grow.
3. Cracks always begin at the surface.
4. Crack formation can be reduced by stress relieving the surface of the metal. (Shot peening is used to improve life of steel springs)
5. Crack formation can be reduced by improving the purity of the metal avoiding inclusions and defects built into the material.
Bottom line: Reeds fail due to crack formation as the result of cyclical elastic deformation over time. This is a classic metal fatigue problem.
My Hunches: Bending notes on the harmonica causes the "opposite" reed to vibrate outside of the slot in an "opening" manner. This may cause greater stress on the reed since its vibrations could be of higher amplitude than a reed vibrating in a "closing" manner. (Johno, have you tested this theory?)
Harmonica manufacturers could improve the longevity of reeds by stress relieveing the surface perhaps by micro-peening or smoothing sharp edges left by grinding the reeds into tune. (Hohner reeds have lots of small scratches left by the tuning process while Suzuki "laser tuned" reeds are somewhat smoother)
Old wisdom: I spoke with an organ reed maker who said that the reeds in some organs have lasted more than 100 years with consistent use. He did warn me that the key to long life was to control the air pressure to the reed and NEVER to blow into a reed to test it since the pressure was not controlled. (Organ reeds are "beating reeds" and not "free reeds" like a harmonica, but the movement of the reed is still cyclical and elastic.)
My question to Johno or others:
Has any quantitative work been done to correlate reed life with:
A. Loudness of playing B. Amount of bending C. Lack of "break in"
Has any similar work been done to correlate guitar string life with the factors above?
Love to talk harps!
dick....
--
Dick Anderson CCMO New Product Engineering Telnet 229-3110 Hewlett Packard Direct Dial 1-303-229-3110 3404 E Harmony Road HPDESK dick_anders~p4000 Fort Collins Colorado 80525 mail anders~c.hp.com