Spence Pearson asks some questions about his CX-12, and chromatics in general.
CHOICE NOTES
First the multiplicity of duplicated notes.
I call these choice notes, because you can choose the one best suited to your purpose. They exist for two reasons.
The duplicated blow C's (or C#'s with the slide in) at each octave break are to even out the blow and draw notes. The C major scale has only seven different notes, and there are eight places to fill, two for each hole. The draw notes take four, leaving only three blow notes, so an extra C is added to even things out. Otherwise, the tuning pattern would change each octave, the way it does on the diatonic from the second octave to the third.
The slide choice notes are C and F. They exist because the slide raises each note of the C major scale one semitone, and B# happens to be C and E# happens to be F. This means that these notes can be either blow or draw, which can greatly assist in smooth phrasing.
My general rule for choosing a duplicated note (C, C#) is to use the one closest to the note that comes *after* - this puts you closer to your destination.
The slide choice notes are more complex. If the notes both preceding and following a C or F are both draw, make the choice note a draw note. If the choice note is surrounded by blow notes, make it a blow note. This much is obvious.
But what if the choice note is in between a blow and a draw note? Then the choice depends on rhythmic context - where the notes fall in relation to the beat. Let's say we have a note sequence of Eb - F - G
Eb is draw, G is blow. If Eb falls on the beat, and F is in the same beat, then phrase the F as a draw note, together with Eb. But let's say Eb falls before the beat, with F on the beat, and G following in the same beat, phrase the F as blow (with the slide in), with the following G.
There are plenty of exceptions to this guideline. Such as jazz, which often phrases the beat with thelast part of the *preceding* beat, note pickups and so on. In these cases, you'd want to reverse what I wrote above re slide choice notes. Check the performance practices for the style(s) you're playing, and phrase accordingly.
AS far as gaining consistency, try applying the rhythmic context rule to your regular scale and arpeggio practice. Write out the scales and note the places where you should use one version or another of a note, then learn them by heart (I have series like this for major scales for $10 if you're interested). Then apply them to your repertoire.
ARTICULATION
As far as articulation goes, am I reading you correctly in taking it that you're tongue blocking despite yourself? If so, it's the first time I've ever heard of anyone saying that tongue blocking made the blow and draw notes more distinct from each other. Most people find that it smooths out the differences.
As far as articulating, i.e., separating each note into a distinct *article* by tongueing or other means, yes, tongue blocking does make it more difficult, but I've heard Robert Bonfiglio play a rapid-fire, very dry staccato while tongue blocking, so I know it can be done. Just takes more work. It can be done by closing the aperture between the tongue and the lip corner - using the tongue - or by saying K-K-K with the upper tongue, which should be left free by the tongue block. A glottal stop can also be used (like a coughing sound, or the sound kids make to imitate a machine gun).
Why the draw notes should be easier to articulate than the blow is unknown to me. Perhaps you could provide more detail.