From: Steve Price Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 14:54:50 -0500 (CDT) Subject: (sorry)Re: continuation of Pete P
sorry folks to belabor this, but I rended myself out of context in my last post. I promise I'll stop this quibbling, but having sent my last post I need to fix one thing.
On Sun, 12 May 1996, Mike Curtis wrote:
> >>> You certainly need a "feel" for blues, jazz, rock, and country, just as you >>> do for classical, and most other musical forms; and you capture this "feel" >>> by exposure (listening). > > >> This was my original point that Mike hinted with a smiley face was rather >> ignorant. > > Au contraire mon pere. Never said it was "ignorant". And I don't "imply". > If I have something to say, I say it.
But Mike you said:
>> And you'll notice that the only ones who argue against musical education are >> those who lack it. I've never heard a well educated musician argue against >> it, even if that well educated musician plays what is considered to be an >> "uneducated" musical style. This should tell us something :-)
First of all, NO ONE HAS SAID THIS ON THE LIST, and it's only by a gross twisting of words and context that would lead Mike to say that. But having been chided by Mike:
Don't the words "uneducated" and "those who lack" a musical education mean ignorant? Excuse me for putting words in your mouth. I'll rephrase and say, this was the point I was making when Mike Curtis chided for being "uneducated" if not "ignorant."