Other web Sites
Harmonica Blues  Harmonica Amps
Harmonica Links Harmonica Pages
Archives Home
Years
 · 1992
 · 1993
 · 1994
 · 1995
 · 1996
 · 1997
 · 1998
 · 1999
 · 2000
 · 2001
 · 2002
 · 2003
 
Web HarpL
Ebay Searches:
Amps:
Microphones:
Effects:
Harmonicas and Gear:
Harmonica Music and Instruction:

 

 

Harp-L Archives

[Previous Message] [Next Message]

[Start of Thread] [End of Thread]

From: Joe Terrasi
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: copyright (no harp content)

Just a side note about copyright.

I have worked in publishing for a number of years, and just by way of
coincidence, I had lunch with our permissions and copyright person
yesterday. Publishers are often (daily, really) asked to grant permission to
reprint material. Many of the people asking for this permission expect that
we will always grant it free of charge as a "service."

Our "commodity," if you will, is intellectual property. We are able to
employ people to develop this intellectual property because we make a
business of selling it. Many of us make our living based on its sale.

I understand that other publishing "cultures," notably academia and certain
online publishers, have very different takes on the nature and transmission
of ownership of these properties. But I often ask my collegues in those
areas to understand that commercial publishing is a very different beast
which offers some advantages that their areas cannot. (Just as they offer
advantages that we cannot.)

Some of you posit that you're happy to give the rights to your writing away.
That's fine, but try looking at it another way. If you sold cars for a
living (my dad does, so no cracks... ok, but only a FEW), and these sales
put food on your table, you'd feel threatened if your customers all decided
that you should just GIVE the cars away. Apply the analogy to whatever you
do for a living. Professional writers and editors develop and sell
intellectual property for a living.

I have been on a *lot* of mailing lists, and this is one of the few that
happens to have some professional writers who contribute fully-formed,
authoritative, professional writing free of charge. I am very grateful to
Winslow, Jon, Kim, and others for that. But they have every right to manage
the rights to those properties as they see fit. This includes asking for
payment if they feel it's appropriate.

- ---------

As an aside (ok, I guess the whole POST is an aside) if you're interested in
a more specific discussion of copyright and copyright law, there's a group
called the "Coalition for Networked Information" that has some interesting
resources related to intellectual property. I receive one (of the many)
mailing lists they sponsor.

To subscribe this list, send the message:
subscribe cni-copyright

to the address:
internet:listpr~ni.org

You can get more information on the CNI at:
http://www.cni.org/