Hi folks, I had been 'of-line' for some time, so I lost the connection to this subject Philippe LAVALLEE from Paris commented on 10-14-96:
>>Subject: Misadministrivia - new posting policy >>After review, we have determined that there is indeed nothing new under >>the sun. All questions we've seen in the past couple of years have been >>commented on and answered. This has all been condensed into a file known >>as FAQ (frequently asked questions). Because of this, it has been >>determined that harp-l is no longer necessary, and everyone should just >>check the FAQ. If it's not there, you don't need to discuss it.
<><>What a surprise to read that! I disagree with this position. The HarpL members has not been asked for their point of view..<><>
The single sentence <nothing new under the sun.<< contains enough stuff for an extended debate. No fear, I've not the intention but would only mention some 'facts' to underline the contrary of this philosophical point of view.
All inventions, scientifical and technical developing, the increase of entropy according to the second law of thermodynamics, the constant edition of newspapers and magazines and last 'and' least the 'developing' of weaponry human beings are using to turn the course of history backwards are some examples for a lot of new under the sun.
However, I agree that questions about the 'second position' or the construction of chromatics (with few exceptions) might be nothing new. But this is no reason to delete the whole harp-L.
We are just going to discuss the hypothesis of 'breaking-in' harps from a more serious basis or achieved certain results about the influence of harp material to the sound and that's very new on harp-L. Any thoughts?