From: Winslow Yerxa <76450.32~ompuServe.COM> Date: 30 Nov 96 22:47:34 EST Subject: Blowing too hard?
TO: internet:harp~arply.com
Siegfried Naruhn finds amusement in my vagueness:
But now, when Mike ask for the physical force which causes the reed interaction, you simply say: "Don't know". Moreover, when Mike thinks about a possible "resonance", you immediately develop a theory about the mouth cavity as a resonance chamber which induces the opening and closing reeds to sound at that pitch.
That's really great, but the top is your remarking in brackets (Why? Dunno. Ask Johno.)
Mark Twain couldn't has said it better. Think about, normally an explanation about any a circumstance is simultaneously and naturally the answer to a "why". But to explain something without knowing the reason is artistic on its highest level. Thanks a lot for this demonstration.
Siegfried, if you read carefully, you'll see that I did not "develop" a theory about resonance. I merely stated the outlines of one that Johno has experimentally verified and published, writing it up with great mathematical accuracy (wanna know the details and the math proofs? Ask Johno).
I stated that this is my "less than scientific understanding" i.e. an understanding, not an experience. One of the meanings of "understanding" in English is that of "received wisdom" that one has not acquired directly, but rather "received" from another source (as phrased: "it is my understanding that . . " or "I am given to understand that . . ." or "my less-than-scientific understanding is that . . ."). I was being very careful here, and not at all "artistic".
You will notice that in the remainder of my post, the only things I state with any assurance are the result of my own direct experience. As I get older and realize that the more I know, the less I understand. And the less likely I am to assert what I cannot directly demonstrate (i.e. that resonance causes bending. This is the almost commonplace wisdom, but I can't pull out a harmonica and prove it in front of you, even though I can demonstrate the things considered to be caused by resonance).
Siegfried goes on:
Whoopy, when the strongest notes are produced by the opening and closing reed, I had known Pat, whether there are some more reeds aside, other than opening or closing. Perhaps half-opening? BTW, when you claim >>-phew, I wish there was a simpler terminology!<<, how should the non-natives find the way among overbends, overdraws, drawbends, benddraws, overdrawbends,....overkill?
Siegfried, once again, you're not reading carefully. A closing reed (e.g. a blow C reed being played at C) or an opening reed (the same C reed being played as a draw reed at C#) can be induced to change pitch, upward for an opening reed, downward for a closing reed. But the C and the C# are the strongest pitches produced by those reeds. My experience, and Pat's, is that as the pitch is altered, the vibration of the reed becomes weaker. That is what he was referring to.
He does, however, assure me
PS. Winslow, I'll not pour a bear on your head next year in Trossingen but would drink it myself, cheers.
Well, that's a relief. And I'll gladly buy it anyway. This may puzzle non-German readers. I have made a vow, as published in Didi Neumann's Harmonica-Player, that if HIP No. 5 has not come out by the International Harmonica Festival in Germany next fall, and if I am there (I hope to be), I will buy a beer for any HIP subscriber on the first night in the Canapee (the blues jam bar), and they are welcome to pour it on my head.