"Bonfiglio encounters a young blues harpist in a Santa Barbara nightclub playing Little Walter solos note for note and is surprised at this curious phenomenon and a little disgusted.... "Some audiences seem to demand just-like-the-record note-for-note recitals of blues tunes, just as they do for pop tunes - a blues cover band. The wrong idea? Of course, but it's out there."
I agree with Winslow. What would most people rather hear? Blues standards or originals?
Truth be told, some original songs aren't all that good. I know. The lyrics are mundane and the tune is like blues elevator music. I hear a lot of original songs on CDs that come into AHN for review--which I try to explain with enough information to let the reader decide whether he would be interested in getting it, I don't rate them with 5 stars, or attack them for being dull (even when they are).
On the other hand, some originals are good. The true test of this is the reaction when they are performed live and bring down the house--just like the standards do-- and most working blues players/writers know what I'm talking about.
Frequently, a band will cover some of the blues standards on its first CD and make a good recording of it. The second time out, the band will feature mostly originals (is "original blues" an oxymoron?) that don't work so well. Because, truth be told, folks, it's tough to come up with first-rate material.
Cover recordings and cover bands have been getting a bad reputation ever since somebody came up with the misguided notion in the 50's that a white artist - --Elvis or Pat Boone among others -- was ripping some poor black artist off by the white one. The truth is that without the "white" version, nobody (in the mass market) would have known who Richard Penniman was. The Stones did the same thing in the 60's.
In the big band era, these songs were simply known as "Standards," which everyone was expected to know and perform.
With rock, the practice continued but not to the same extent. (They may have been recorded, but they never made the charts, so they never got played on the AM radio, and later FM, so they didn't exist for all practicality.
The reality is that as long as records have been made, as soon as "Zelda Smith" had a hit recording of "The Down Home Blues," Bessie Smith, Clara Smith and every other Smith put out a "cover" of it to take advantage of the popular song (and these were just the black artists). Bessie Smith's fans always knew that sooner or later Bessie would record --er- cover--every hit tune that came out and all they had to do was wait.
In the 50's, the same studio would put out an R&B version, a country version and a pop version of the hot tunes (often at the same time) --the idea being to sell as many copies of each tune as possible because the record company owned the publishing rights and the more copies of the song sold, the more money the company made. The profit motive.
(This is not to say that artists didn't get ripped off; they did, and always will until they get smart enough to hire their own lawyers & accountant to deal with the record companies--but that's another story and another string.)
So, given the choice of listening to a Little Walter clone play "Juke" or improvisations based on "Juke" I think I might prefer the "real thing" rather than an "improvement" "even if it did have the right chords and changes and four beats to each measure."
Phil Lloyd American Harmonica Newsmagazine 616-962-2989 for a free copy in USA
Return-Path: Received: from relay19.mail.aol.com (relay19.mail.aol.com [172.31.106.65]) by air17.mail.aol.com (v37.8) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:13:53 -0500 Received: from foo.garply.com (foo.garply.com [165.113.188.2]) by relay19.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id KAA07305; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:12:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from daem~ocalhost) by foo.garply.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) id JAA18711 for harp-l-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 09:10:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from hil-img-8.compuserve.com (hil-img-8.compuserve.com [149.174.177.138]) by foo.garply.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA16829 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 09:10:12 -0600 (CST) Received: (from mailga~ocalhost) by hil-img-8.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.10) id KAA10164 for harp~arply.com; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:09:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:05:36 -0500 From: Winslow Yerxa <76450.32~ompuserve.com> Subject: The Blues Recital To: harp~arply.com Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-harp~oo.garply.com Precedence: bulk Errors-To: harp-l-boun~arply.com
TO: internet:harp~arply.com
Bonfiglio encounters a young blues harpist in a Santa Barbara nightclub playing Little Walter solos note for note and is surprised at this curious phenomenon and a little disgusted.
Other respond that he's young; it's part of the learning process; he'll grow out of it.
So much for the nervous student hoping to get it right. But what about the dour, flinty-eyed judges writing copiously on their evaluation pads?
I mean, of course, the audience. Some audiences seem to demand just-like-the-record note-for-note recitals of blues tunes, just as they do for pop tunes - a blues cover band. The wrong idea? Of course, but it's out there.
Perhaps this is in inverse proportion to the player's self-confidence and ability to engage (or even steamroller) an audience. The young, timid player who's too busy getting it right to project authority and transmit rhythm and emotion to an audience will spur in them a demand for something, anything - how about the song the way they know it - that's an obvious concrete thing to fill the void when the performers aren't delivering anything they can latch on to.
Even a seasoned pro will have off nights, when nothing else seems to work and s/he falls back on the tried and true. Which for a player of little experience, is what was recently learned off a record.