> once saw a really well known blues band with a very good harp player do > ""Juke" almost note-for-note and it bored me to tears. I say "almost > note-for-note", as they finished the Little Walter repro, then recycled the > first few bars, making the tune almost twice as long as the original (and > less than half as enjoyable). Having said all of this, I was one of only a > few people who weren't going beserk over the music... > Pat,
For you the piece was a reproduction and ho hum but possibly for many in the audience it was the "original" and out of sight. The net effect is still positive for harp music. FWIW, I personally agree..... The last thing I want to see on ~most~songs is a note for note reproduction.