Other web Sites
Harmonica Blues  Harmonica Amps
Harmonica Links Harmonica Pages
Archives Home
Years
 · 1992
 · 1993
 · 1994
 · 1995
 · 1996
 · 1997
 · 1998
 · 1999
 · 2000
 · 2001
 · 2002
 · 2003
 
Web HarpL
Ebay Searches:
Amps:
Microphones:
Effects:
Harmonicas and Gear:
Harmonica Music and Instruction:

 

 

Harp-L Archives

[Previous Message] [Next Message]

[Start of Thread] [End of Thread]

From: "Steve R. Pruitt"
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 09:09:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Tax write-offs (worker vs. subcontractor)

Building on what Ed Kliman wrote:


> speaking as someone who's been audited to death for following advice i
> actually got from an i.r.s. employee, DO NOT do anything that will attract
> their attention - once you're in the system you are marked as an easy
> squeeze for money and yes, they are as brutal and inept as all the horror
> stories make them out to be. for those of you who are actually band
> leaders, be aware that the i.r.s. has changed rules about paying your
> sidemen and simply issuing a 1099 form is not enough. the i.r.s. has
> changed the rules regarding the difference between "subcontractor" and
> "employee" and, in my case, regarded musicians used on the majority of my
> gigs as actual employees, even though i'd sent everyone 1099 forms as
> subcontractors. i actually paid more in penalties and interest than i
> earned in one particular year as a musician. i have heard from other
> musicians that they only apply this subcontractor/employee thing if they
> have you in for an audit and need more money to make their quota, but it
> wouldn't hurt to consult your accountant about it and spare yourself the
> educational experience i've had.


I attended a seminar this week on starting a small business, and one of
the handouts detailed the issue of employee/subcontracter. There was a
list of 20 tests to determine a worker's status.



Small businesses, in classifying workers as independent contractors, can
trigger an audit from the Internal Revenue Service. Since smaller firms
lack the monies to challenge the Internal Revenue Service, either
through appeals through that agencey or in the federal courts, it is
imperative that these small businesses properly classify their workers.
In our workshops, we have stressed the importance of the 20-point test
for classifying workers.

The worker is generally an employee if she or he:

1. Has a continuing relationship with the employer.
2. May quit work at any time without incurring liability.
3. Works for one employer at a time.
4. Must follow employer's instructions about the work.
5. Receives training from employer or professionally hired by employer.
6. Work hours are set by employer and followed by worker.
7. Works full time for an employer.
8. Worker provides services that are integral to the business.
9. Provides services that must be personally rendered.
10. Worker cannot hire, supervise and pay her or his assistants.
11. Does work on employer's premises.
12. Submits regular reports to the employer.
13. Receives pay regularly based on time worked for employer.
14. Is reimbursed for business and traveling expenses.
15. Employer furnishes tools and materials for worker to do the job.
16. Worker does not offer services to general public.
17. Employer can fire worker at will.
18. Worker does work for one employer at a time.
19. Worker does not have a major investment in facilities used to
perform service.
20. Worker does not incur profit or loss performance of services.

As you can see from the above 20-point test, the key word is "control."
The employer controls what work must be done and how it must be done.
The above 20-point test is what the Internal Revenue Service uses to
make a determination of whether a worker is an employee or an
independent contractor. But it does not say how many yes answers it
requires before deciding a worker cannot be called an independent
contractor. Plus, some states have guidelines for classifying
independent contractors that differ from the federal government's.
Moreover, state governments and the IRS exchange information regularly
during audits, and "many times, a state audit will trigger a federal
one."



Part of the seminar had a lawyer who spoke emphatically about doing
ANYTHING to keep the IRS off your back. He had some more of those horror
stories we've all heard about the ruthlessness of the organization.

Just wanted to pass this along. When this handout was distributed, it
started me thinking about Harp-L, and the recent contributions by
everyone, but especially what Ed had posted about using 1099s to pay
workers.

later,

Steve P.