From: "jrross" Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 17:49:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Reed_design=2C_was_Chromatic=5FRattle=5F&=5FH_ohne?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?r=B4s=5F? I feel that I must point out one very good reason why brass would be better than steel in a harmonica reed. While steel will last longer before it fails, when it fails it will break off. When brass fails it bends. If I were a manufacturer I would certainly not want to put myself in position for potential lawsuits because a reed broke off and lodged in someone's throat. While this is a very rare occurrence with brass, I would guess that it would become more common with the use of steel for the reeds.
If you really want a high quality chromatic, you have to go to the customizers, who have the time to focus on one instrument and get it right. A mass manufacturer will not be capable of this, unless they radically change the means of production (which, I beleive, is being looked into by at least one of the major harmonica companies) into a single-person/single-unit situation, IMO.
Still, the customizers are fairly inexpensive and are able to shape their products to the individuals desires. Thus, for a reasonable cost you can get a mouthpiece which fits perfectly into _your_ mouth, I sincerely doubt that any manufacturer will measure your mouth and then make the mouthpiece. Good, quality instruments in both diatonic and chromatic are availiable from customizers, so why not take advantage of this current rennaisance (pun intended)?
.()(). J.R. "Bulldogge" Ross () () And Snuffy, too:) `----'