Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 13:36:08 -0400 (EDT) From: mlpra~is.net Subject: Buddy Lucas
Bob's comment on Buddy Lucas "Buddy's harp-playing leaves much to be desired." and Chris's expansion on that leave me with a question or two. Personally I enjoyed what I heard on Nina Simone - The Blues. I thought Buddy's playing generally fit the context of the songs, didn't interfere with the female voice, (our new mantra :-))etc. Certainly it didn't break new ground, or inspire a generation of imitators, but its not bad. BTW, (warning personal opinion coming)the album is more of a fusion of Jazz, Blues, and R&B then a clear example of either style.
I have no problem with Bob and Chris's statements in and of themselves. They are entitled to their opinion, as we all are. But, I wonder sometimes when we criticize another player's performance (constructively or otherwise) what was the criteria. If something "leaves much to be desired", well, what was desired? If we are looking for a certain sound, and what we hear ain't it, then, I guess, that's what was left to be desired. On the other hand, when I don't hear what I would expect, I'd like to know what was the performer intending to create. This causes me to shy away from "this is good" or "this is bad" based on what I would play and to consider that there are multiple ways to approach any piece of music. In the end, I can be more creative by listening to other players and incorporating "this and that" of theirs into my playing.